Jump to content

True Type Font For Searchable PDF


Recommended Posts

I have a client who used Simplex.shx font all over their drawing package. Is there a way to use Simplex.ttf in a text style instead? I have read and searched all over and haven't gotten anything to work. When I go to my style manager Simplex_IV25 and SimplexIV_IV50 are the only true type fonts I can use of Simplex. They are wider and bolder than the regular version, which is not selectable. I would like to change the style using a script on my 300+ drawings so that when we convert to PDF it is searchable. I cannot use either Simplex_IV25 or Simplex_IV50 because the clients would notice and would complain, it would also throw alignment off. I am using ACADE 2015. Any other info needed, I can gladly give.

 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I am out of luck if I want to replace the text in the drawings so that their appearance doesn't change and they are searchable in PDF?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't you just rename the .ttf file to simplex.ttf and / or get a ttf file that looks the same as the .shx file? I still prefer .shx because ttf has some funny display behaviour inside AutoCAD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I am out of luck if I want to replace the text in the drawings so that their appearance doesn't change and they are searchable in PDF?

 

It's been a while but I got limited results using Bluebeam to capture .shx fonts in the past. Maybe you could give it a trial.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AutoCAD's Swiss family of ttf's is pretty good. I've used their Swiss Lt BT for 95% of my text for at least a decade. It's much more compact and readable than any shx font. Copy any sentence and compare the two styles. I use title case for all my labeling and sentence case for notes. Civil drawing require conserving screen space, just not enough room on the paper any other way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why don't you just rename the .ttf file to simplex.ttf and / or get a ttf file that looks the same as the .shx file? I still prefer .shx because ttf has some funny display behaviour inside AutoCAD

 

If you mean change the .shx extension to .ttf of simplex, it doesn't work that way. The files do not store the same information and cannot simply go back and forth. I've never seen strange behavior from a ttf in CAD, but I would gladly trade that for the ability to search in a PDF since none of our customers use Electrical and our packages are 100's of pages long.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's been a while but I got limited results using Bluebeam to capture .shx fonts in the past. Maybe you could give it a trial.

 

Some of my coworkers have it, but our company wont buy everyone a seat so I am stuck without. I may have them try it out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AutoCAD's Swiss family of ttf's is pretty good. I've used their Swiss Lt BT for 95% of my text for at least a decade. It's much more compact and readable than any shx font. Copy any sentence and compare the two styles. I use title case for all my labeling and sentence case for notes. Civil drawing require conserving screen space, just not enough room on the paper any other way.

 

I am almost always limited to the fonts and styles picked by the customer, but I will try to remember that if/when I do have some freedom in that area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am almost always limited to the fonts and styles picked by the customer.

 

Explain to the customer that if they want searchable PDFs, they should use TTFs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

AutoCAD 2016 (I do believe DWG TrueView as well) and newer DWGtoPDF.pc3 creates searchable .shx text.

 

Acrobat Pro has an OCR that works pretty good most of the time for converting old PDFs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...