Cad Handbook!

[ircanete]

thanks, PINEAPPLE...
this will give us a headstart... it will also help us alot!!!
thanks again...

[nocturne00]

There's no greater compliment than that Feel free to use it! I'm still working on a few other pages. I'll post here once it's finished, but this should give you a nice start! Thanks

Very nice manual, straight to the point. lookin forward to your additions. im also writing one for our company at the moment, cant get to finish due to loads of work. ill post mine too if im done.

[gbelous]

Thanks, that helped a lot...have you added much since then?

[Ryder76]

Very nice - looking forward to seeing the finished manual.

[todouble22]

There's no greater compliment than that Feel free to use it! I'm still working on a few other pages. I'll post here once it's finished, but this should give you a nice start! Thanks

Very nice work Pineapple. I drafted a quick one up this week as well and figured it may be useful to some other folks out there. Definately not finishe and I need to work on the formatting a bit but its a start.

[Tankman]

Well done on your manual, it must have taken some time to put together.

I hope your boss appreciates it.

Very nice, I did indulge and save a copy. Can't wait to see more!

[Tankman]

Very nice work Pineapple. I drafted a quick one up this week as well and figured it may be useful to some other folks out there. Definately not finished and I need to work on the formatting a bit but its a start.

More nice standards work! Looking forward to the finished product!

[brl2008]

Pineapple & todouble22
I like that you two put a small manual together and see that there some different in style. I feel I'm new at autocad and trying to some on my own at home. Have some standards to reveiw will help be a better drafter. Can not wait for the updates down the road. Thank you both for taking the time to do it.
Bruce

[kevin1973]

Good stuff guys. I have actually used ideas that I got from your manuals while creating mine. Mine is going to be a little more in depth because we use a 3rd party duct drafting software and we do a lot of Army Corp jobs so I want to "duplicate" a lot of the standards they use. I'll post as soon I can get a little further along.

Hope this thread keeps going.

[MikeScott]

This one is less CAD specific, and more of a drafting/engineering standard that covers a broader range, but I found it to be interesting and useful. My old job had to follow it for doing a project for NASA.

We initially didn't know about the requirements, (thanks to a sales team that didn't care, and just enjoyed commission, figuring we'd handle all that) and I just sent them our normal drawing sets, and LET ME TELL YOU.. the redlined prints we got back were staggering. I'd never had a client tell me my notes were in the wrong place?!, and they drew new titleblocks all over several pages and required us to use new naming conventions and all sorts of stuff.

It was two resubmissions before they even started looking at the design I'd come-up with:
http://mscweb.gsfc.nasa.gov/543web/f...-673-64-1F.pdf