Registered forum members do not see this ad.
If I use a csv file and scale my drawing it works thanks for the help.
I'm very new to the autocad and have lots to learn so these little things I can pick up help out alot.
Lee Mac Programming
With Mathematics there is the possibility of perfect rigour, so why settle for less?
Just another Swamper
Code in first post updated to Version 1.6, this now enables Block as Input Type![]()
Lee Mac Programming
With Mathematics there is the possibility of perfect rigour, so why settle for less?
Just another Swamper
I have invested a little time in this program and updated the code in the first post to Version 1.7.
This version sees a hell of a lot of upgrades to the program, as shown in the program header.
The user can now sort Points, change point format, choose an arbitrary data delimiter, among many other exciting updates...
As always, your feedback is treasured
Lee
Lee Mac Programming
With Mathematics there is the possibility of perfect rigour, so why settle for less?
Just another Swamper
Lee Mac Programming
With Mathematics there is the possibility of perfect rigour, so why settle for less?
Just another Swamper
That looks awsomecan't wait to try it this thing helps me so much down loading it now!
Thanks Keith -
I though you might like the Point Format option![]()
Lee Mac Programming
With Mathematics there is the possibility of perfect rigour, so why settle for less?
Just another Swamper
Lee,
Would it be possible to populate a block attribute from an additional column in the dataset upon insertion?
And/or could a block's dynamic features (i.e. linear dimension) be set from another column?
(somethiong like: X, Y, Z, Tree#, Circle Radius)
Registered forum members do not see this ad.
I'm not sure about Dynamic Blocks, as I have never used them, but certainly for normal blocks, the file format should be:
[x-coord] [y-coord] [z-coord] [attrib1] [attrib2] [attrib3] ... [attribn]
And make sure that you have the toggle set correctly.
Lee Mac Programming
With Mathematics there is the possibility of perfect rigour, so why settle for less?
Just another Swamper
Bookmarks