I always thought of it as the "Lite" version of AutoCAD being that it was missing the 3D creation capabilities of it's big brother.
Myself, I think AutoCAD should discontinue LT but that's my opinion.
KC
Registered forum members do not see this ad.
Auto Cad LT is a cheaper version of AutoCad. So what is meaning of word "LT" (Abbreviation) in the phrase "Autocad LT"?
Please explain for me! Thank you!
I always thought of it as the "Lite" version of AutoCAD being that it was missing the 3D creation capabilities of it's big brother.
Myself, I think AutoCAD should discontinue LT but that's my opinion.
KC
I think "LT" means "LapTop". It's the little brother for 2D only, with less functions so that it requires less computing power.
At that time laptops were just very limited.
It's nice to be nice, but sometimes is nicer to be evil!.
![]()
Tip: Please do not PM or email me with CAD questions - use the forums, you'll get an answer sooner.




LT has always been built on AutoCAD, so the system specs are pretty much the same. If the specs for LT are slightly lower, it's only because of the anticipated use of 3D in AutoCAD.
Essentially, Autodesk never said what LT stood for, but it's commonly accepted as short for "Lite".Originally Posted by TuKhuyen
See:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/autofile/www...00000000000000
http://www.fourmilab.ch/autofile/www...00000000000000
Also, there is more missing in LT than just 3D. This is couple of versions old, but the summary is still valid AFAIK: http://cadpanacea.com/node/96



The Autodesk preffered line is 'Limited' (as bandied about at AU).
Essentially you have the full product on your machine but Autodesk have 'Limited' what can be done with it... e.g. The've turned off all the tools that create 3D objects, cut of access to the API's and left out tools such as the sheet set manager.
Because you have the full product you can still open drawing files that have been created in the full version - even if they contain 3D objects - but your editing ability is also 'Limited'.
'Lite' is the accepted meaning, but technically incorrect if you want to get pedantic about it ;-)
I still think they should go to a 3 tier system...
LT - no 3D or lisp, arx, etc, but also add some 2D functionality like enhanced usage of raster images, transparent fills and finally make LT the standard in 2D CAD.
$500
Full - 3D solids, lisp, arx, etc. Pretty much the same as we have now but remove the rendering engine.
$2500
Pro - every thing
$4000
Please do not PM me with CAD questions. Post your question on the forum. Our users are the best out there and you'll get the best possible answer to your question.
- http://f700es.deviantart.com/gallery/ - - http://cad-guy.tumblr.com/ -




Looking at it from the Autodesk point of view... there is no reason to.
(A) People are already buying LT (with fewer features than you describe) for twice your proposed price.
(B) People are already buying full AutoCAD for ±$4000, so there is no market (as far as Autodesk is concerned) for your $2500 solution. Anyone who is potentially in that market now is buying the full version already, so why lose $1500 profit?
Registered forum members do not see this ad.
Another low cost alternate for 2D drawings/sketches would be AutoCAD Freestyle. Suggested retail price of $149 but available for a limited time at $79.
http://usa.autodesk.com/adsk/servlet...&siteID=123112
"I have only come here seeking knowledge. Things they wouldn't teach me of in college." The Police
Eat brains...gain more knowledge!
Bookmarks