You will get a better and faster response if you post in the correct area of the forum.
Question moved to the Lisp section.

Registered forum members do not see this ad.
This works good but, I would like to have the 2 objects rotate clockwise..not Counter clockwise
(defun c:90R( / e f p a b c i)
(vl-load-com)
(setvar "cmdecho" 1)
(setq e (vlax-ename->vla-object (car (entsel "\nSelect object: "))))
(setq f (vlax-ename->vla-object (car (entsel "\nSelect object: "))))
(setq p (getpoint "\nSelect rotation point: "))
(setq a 1 ; Number of revolutions
b 1 ; Degrees per increment (must be a factor of 90)
c 01 ; Delay between incremental rotation
i 0) ;
(if (= 0 (rem (setq d (/ 90 b)) -1))
(while (< i a)
(repeat d
(vla-rotate e (vlax-3d-point p) (* (/ pi 180.0) b))
(vla-rotate f (vlax-3d-point p) (* (/ pi 180.0) b))
(vl-cmdf "delay" c "regen")
)
(setq i (1+ i))
)
)
)
You will get a better and faster response if you post in the correct area of the forum.
Question moved to the Lisp section.
"Work Smart, Not Hard"
Click to View My Portfolio ( Updated 05/21/2013 ) ---> http://www.rdeweese.com/
Just change your angle to a negative number. Hell, make 180. -180.
DropBox | finding the light...
Seann: ...it went crazy ex-girlfriend on me...
eric_monceaux...its pretty funny seeing two AutoCAD Gods give each other flak...
djw
Try to use # button to paste your code to be readable as a code
Code:LIKE THIS
Sorry for my English.
Hi
Here it goes,
RegardsCode:(defun c:90R( / e f p a b c i) (vl-load-com) (setvar "angdir" 1) (setvar "cmdecho" 1) (setq e (vlax-ename->vla-object (car (entsel "\nSelect object: ")))) (setq f (vlax-ename->vla-object (car (entsel "\nSelect object: ")))) (setq p (getpoint "\nSelect rotation point: ")) (setq a 1 ; Number of revolutions b 1 ; Degrees per increment (must be a factor of 90) c 01 ; Delay between incremental rotation i 0) ; (if (= 0 (rem (setq d (/ 90 b)) -1)) (while (< i a) (repeat d (vla-rotate e (vlax-3d-point p) (* (/ pi 180.0) b)) (vla-rotate f (vlax-3d-point p) (* (/ pi 180.0) b)) (vl-cmdf "delay" c "regen") ) (setq i (1+ i)) )) (setvar "angdir" 0) )
Tharwat
Check Red code
Why did you select object 2 times (e and f)
Code:(defun c:90R( / e f p a b c i) (vl-load-com) (defun *error* (msg) (and uFlag (vla-EndUndoMark doc)) (or (wcmatch (strcase msg) "*BREAK,*CANCEL*,*EXIT*") (princ (strcat "\n** Error: " msg " **"))) (princ) ) (setq OldCMDEcho (getvar "cmdecho") ; Save System Variable (setvar "cmdecho" 1) (setq e (vlax-ename->vla-object (car (entsel "\nSelect object: "))) f (vlax-ename->vla-object (car (entsel "\nSelect object: "))) p (getpoint "\nSelect rotation point: ") a 1 ; Number of revolutions b 1 ; Degrees per increment (must be a factor of 90) c 01 ; Delay between incremental rotation i 0) ; (if (= 0 (rem (setq d (/ 90 b)) -1)) (while (< i a) (repeat d (vla-rotate e (vlax-3d-point p) (* (/ pi 180.0) b)) (vla-rotate f (vlax-3d-point p) (* (/ pi 180.0) b)) (vl-cmdf "delay" c "regen") ) (setq i (1+ i)) ) ) (setvar "cmdecho" OldCMDEcho) ; restore System Variable (princ) )
Sorry for my English.
Why this?
Or was it just a copy/paste job from my code?Code:(and uFlag (vla-EndUndoMark doc))![]()
Lee Mac Programming
With Mathematics there is the possibility of perfect rigour, so why settle for less?
Just another Swamper
Seems like that but there was a code line I didnt paste.
Any way welcome backCode:(setq uFlag (vla-EndUndoMark doc))
Sorry for my English.

Thought I was post’n in the correct place? AutoCAD Forums> AutoCAD Customization> AutoLISP, Visual LISP & DCL
Anyhow think U-all for the reply’s.. Alanjt (–180) seems to work,
just try’n to learn, could you translate to plane English?
(vla-rotate e (vlax-3d-point p) (* (/ pi 180.0) b))
“(vla-rotate e” =Selected object
e
“(vlax-3d-point p)”=get 3D x y z of Selected object
e, what doses the “p” do?
“(* (/ pi 180.0) b))”= ???? 180 = Counter clockwise
-180 clockwise ??????
ya I know just try’n to learn..
Asos2000, object 2? Rotating two objects @ the same time..
thanks again…
Registered forum members do not see this ad.
Lee Mac Programming
With Mathematics there is the possibility of perfect rigour, so why settle for less?
Just another Swamper
Bookmarks