+ Reply to Thread
Results 1 to 10 of 10
  1. #1
    Forum Newbie
    Using
    AutoCAD 2011
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    9

    Question Reverse Hollow tool exist?

    Registered forum members do not see this ad.

    Hello, Is there a Reverse Hollow tool out there or method available?

    Basically what we have are complex models with full internals given to us for our AutoCAD drawings. Imagine the Complex model is a Car engine or a house. We don't need all the internals and with them our 3D video cards and processing speeds drop considerably and sometimes crashes our PC's. What we want to do is get the .sat files from them as just the external skin of the models. Would there be a tool out there for this?

    PS: IT gave us all the best hardware and can't go any further they said. So we're not interested in fighting that battle again. Right now we need to see if the above exists yet.

    Thanks.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Computer Details
    Bishop's Computer Details
    Operating System:
    Windows 7 Enterprise
    Computer:
    Dell Precision T1600
    CPU:
    Xeon E3-1280
    RAM:
    16 GB
    Graphics:
    Quadro 600 1024 MB
    Primary Storage:
    Seagate 250GB - ST3250312AS
    Secondary Storage:
    Western Digital 1024 GB - External
    Monitor:
    2x Dell P2211H @ 1920 x 1080
    Discipline
    Multi-disciplinary
    Bishop's Discipline Details
    Occupation
    CAD Design, Manufacturing
    Discipline
    Multi-disciplinary
    Using
    Inventor 2013
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    People's Republic of California
    Posts
    321

    Default

    You can do it with Shrinkwrap, I think, but I haven't really worked with that too much so I don't know the exact steps.

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Computer Details
    abstracted's Computer Details
    Operating System:
    Vista 7 64bit
    Using
    Inventor 2013
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Dallas, Texas
    Posts
    13

    Default

    Yes, use shrinkwrap. It is designed specifically for simplifying models to consume less computer resources.

  4. #4
    Forum Newbie
    Using
    AutoCAD 2011
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Anything else other than Shrinkwrap? Shrinkwrap creates Meshes in AutoCAD and when your looking at a complex assembly in Wireframe/2D Wireframe (or whatever the default view is considered now), the model gets extremely hard to see. Not to mention getting it to correctly Shrinkwrap everything is rather long.

    So back to my question. Is there anything else other than Skrinkwrap?

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Computer Details
    Bishop's Computer Details
    Operating System:
    Windows 7 Enterprise
    Computer:
    Dell Precision T1600
    CPU:
    Xeon E3-1280
    RAM:
    16 GB
    Graphics:
    Quadro 600 1024 MB
    Primary Storage:
    Seagate 250GB - ST3250312AS
    Secondary Storage:
    Western Digital 1024 GB - External
    Monitor:
    2x Dell P2211H @ 1920 x 1080
    Discipline
    Multi-disciplinary
    Bishop's Discipline Details
    Occupation
    CAD Design, Manufacturing
    Discipline
    Multi-disciplinary
    Using
    Inventor 2013
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    People's Republic of California
    Posts
    321

    Default

    If you're using Inventor, then why do you care about AutoCAD views?

    Use Inventor, do your drawings in Inventor, and then if someone needs AutoCAD versions, export your Inventor drawings to .DWG, and they'll look just fine. If you've got Inventor but you still do drawings in AutoCAD ... then you wasted a whole metric crapload of money on Inventor, and you're wasting a whole lot metric crapload of productive time by not using it.

  6. #6
    Forum Deity rkent's Avatar
    Computer Details
    rkent's Computer Details
    Operating System:
    WIN7 PRO 64bit
    Computer:
    Dell Precision T7500
    CPU:
    Xeon Dual Core E5503 2.0Ghz
    RAM:
    6GB DDR3 ECC SDRAM, 1333MHz, 6x1GB
    Graphics:
    nVidia Quadro 3800
    Primary Storage:
    300Gb, 10K rpm
    Monitor:
    Dell 24" FS (2x)
    Discipline
    Mechanical
    rkent's Discipline Details
    Occupation
    Facilities Design - Semi-conductor manufacturing
    Discipline
    Mechanical
    Details
    Designer: Process Piping, P&ID's, Machine Part Design, Planning / General Arrangement. Facilities Management. Drafting: Electrical, Controls, Architectural.
    Using
    Mechanical 2014
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Lat:35, Long:-106, Elev: 5164'
    Posts
    3,372

    Default

    You can use Level Of Detail (LOD), derived parts from assemblies, or shrinkwrap. Those are the three that I know of so far in my steep learning curve.
    "You are entitled to your own opinion but you are not entitled to your own facts." Daniel Patrick Moynihan

  7. #7
    Luminous Being JD Mather's Avatar
    Using
    Inventor 2013
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Williamsport, PA
    Posts
    6,906

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by YPSDude View Post
    Anything else other than Shrinkwrap? Shrinkwrap creates Meshes in AutoCAD ...
    Then you are not using it correctly for your purposes. You can get a solid dwg (one way or another). There is also a tool on labs.autodesk.com to simplify working with shrinkwrap.

    You might also look into Derived Component. A good understanding of Derived Component might help with Shrinkwrap.
    Certified SolidWorks Professional
    Autodesk Inventor 2013 Certified Professional
    Autodesk AutoCAD 2013 Certified Professional
    http://home.pct.edu/~jmather/content..._Tutorials.htm

  8. #8
    Forum Newbie
    Using
    AutoCAD 2011
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    9

    Default

    I have no choice on the matter of Inventor use or not. My department is not allowed to use Inventor due to restrictions of planning and size of our projects. I simply want to take a complex model and turn it solid (removing all intellectual property) so we can use it in our larger models.

    Level of Detail just seems to turn on and off objects. It does not seem to meet our needs. Sorry.

    The Simplify Tools seems to be a better option for a more advanced control. The only down side is that I have almost 100 models to Simplify lol. (Currently showing some coworkers.)

    Any other options?

    (See below for update)
    Last edited by YPSDude; 1st Aug 2012 at 02:23 pm.

  9. #9
    Luminous Being JD Mather's Avatar
    Using
    Inventor 2013
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Williamsport, PA
    Posts
    6,906

    Default

    Nothing you wrote makes sense to me. I don't understand why there is a problem. Good luck!
    Certified SolidWorks Professional
    Autodesk Inventor 2013 Certified Professional
    Autodesk AutoCAD 2013 Certified Professional
    http://home.pct.edu/~jmather/content..._Tutorials.htm

  10. #10
    Forum Newbie
    Using
    AutoCAD 2011
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Posts
    9

    Default

    Registered forum members do not see this ad.

    The Simplify Tools seems to be a better option for a more advanced control. The only down side is that I have almost 100 models to Simplify lol. (Currently showing some coworkers.)
    Just found out it's for Inventor 2013. My company has 2012 and won't update until maybe Oct.

    Any other options?
    Like pouring a liquid into a mold and being able to export the final shape? I know there's subtraction tools but with using that in AutoCAD you have alot of editing to fully get what we want. This take alot when the entire shape is quite complex.

Similar Threads

  1. block that exist doesn't exist
    By dusko in forum AutoCAD Beginners' Area
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 8th Jul 2010, 04:04 pm
  2. Does this symbol exist in AC Electrical?
    By ReMark in forum Electrical
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 18th May 2010, 07:09 pm
  3. Samples in Tool Palettes do not exist
    By beteemil in forum AutoCAD Beginners' Area
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 17th May 2010, 02:57 pm
  4. Does this tool exist in AutoCAD?
    By Mr.Alex in forum AutoCAD Beginners' Area
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10th Jan 2009, 03:14 pm
  5. command exist or not!! how to find?
    By musa in forum AutoLISP, Visual LISP & DCL
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 29th Aug 2006, 06:03 pm

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts