Jump to content

Finding inertia of two sections


alrighty93

Recommended Posts

Hi there

 

New to the forum. I have two sections both region-ed. What is the correct way to find the combined inertia. The sections kind of "fit" into each other. So far I have used two different methods and I don't know which is correct.

 

1. Centre each section individually, find the section properties of each sections and then add them together.

 

2. Combine the section, centre them together, and then find the inertia of the combined sections.

 

So which one is correct? The first one gives a much smaller I value then the second ones.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi there

 

New to the forum. I have two sections both region-ed. What is the correct way to find the combined inertia. The sections kind of "fit" into each other. So far I have used two different methods and I don't know which is correct.

 

1. Centre each section individually, find the section properties of each sections and then add them together.

 

2. Combine the section, centre them together, and then find the inertia of the combined sections.

 

So which one is correct? The first one gives a much smaller I value then the second ones.

I'm not sure what you mean by "centre" a section. If you are talking about the moment of inertia, look into the parallel axis theorem. Your moment of inertia is dependent on what axis you are referencing.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Also, note that if you build a composite section from overlapping sections, then the resultant sectional area will be smaller than the two separate areas simply added together. Coplanar figures don't stack in 3D.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not sure what you mean by "centre" a section.

 

By Centre, I mean find the centre of the object, and move it so thats its centroid is sitting at 0,0. So I would have done this for two different sections (which fit together, no overlapping) find the inertia while each section is at 0,0, and then add them together. Which I assume now is the wrong way to go?

 

Thanks for your help

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're welcome, of course. To do it right, the two areas must maintain their relationship for the calculation. If they kind of fit but don't touch, you can still UNION the two regions, then use MASSPROP to get the new composite area.

 

NOTE: If you still have trouble after reading this, try posting your areas you want to analyze (preferably as a DWG so no one has to draw it).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help.

 

Have figured it out. I think it is ok to get the inertia of both sections individually as they are not properly "connected" so they will be rotating around there own axis, not there combined.

 

Thanks again :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for your help.

 

Have figured it out. I think it is ok to get the inertia of both sections individually as they are not properly "connected" so they will be rotating around there own axis, not there combined.

 

Thanks again :)

Great that you've got it figured out. And, you're welcome again.;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...