Noahma Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 Eh, maybe, but here in Dallas Texas, Revit has completely taken over most of the big architectural firms that we deal with, and trust me it will continue being pushed and adopted. And I would even debate AutoCAD Architecture being used, ESPECIALLY for 3D which is what the original poster was asking.... :wink: it is going to be the large program in the industry eventually, but there are some large hurdles to overcome before that can happen. Mainly for the firms that are not multi-disciplinary. the file sharing is very tedious with Revit IE everyone has to be using the same version as there is no backwards compatability. For large frims this is an easy one because they are a one stop shop. For us smaller guys it is the thing that kills Revit adoption. Most of us in the office know Revit, but we use many different structural engineers, HVAC, and electrical companies, and making sure they all have the most current form of the program is well. Not easy at all. Autocad Architecture although having a very steep learning curve can do everything Revit can, (minus the cool parametric) but is still based on the industry standard DWG (which is a strength and weakness) I can bring in items from the previous to the most current version of MEP into our model with little problems. And Autocad Architecture is a very capable Modeling program, including all that is available in Autocad in terms of modeling, plus the added AEC objects within the BIM realm to produce some very nice models, quickly and efficiently. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tzframpton Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 it is going to be the large program in the industry eventually, but there are some large hurdles to overcome before that can happen. Mainly for the firms that are not multi-disciplinary. the file sharing is very tedious with Revit IE everyone has to be using the same version as there is no backwards compatability. For large frims this is an easy one because they are a one stop shop. For us smaller guys it is the thing that kills Revit adoption. Most of us in the office know Revit, but we use many different structural engineers, HVAC, and electrical companies, and making sure they all have the most current form of the program is well. Not easy at all. Autocad Architecture although having a very steep learning curve can do everything Revit can, (minus the cool parametric) but is still based on the industry standard DWG (which is a strength and weakness) I can bring in items from the previous to the most current version of MEP into our model with little problems. And Autocad Architecture is a very capable Modeling program, including all that is available in Autocad in terms of modeling, plus the added AEC objects within the BIM realm to produce some very nice models, quickly and efficiently. Fine, you win. Revit is crap and AutoCAD Architecture is the best. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Noahma Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 Fine, you win. Revit is crap and AutoCAD Architecture is the best. I never said that. He had asked about what he should learn in terms of industry standard. I would suggest learning both what is standard now, and what will be standard in the future after it matures more, which would be Autocad and one of its verticals, and Revit. Neither one is better than the other, they are on equal terms right now with Revit being slightly more polished in terms of parametric capabilities (both ACA and Revit are relatively the same age with ACA being two years older) They are both viable BIM solutions, and it is better to have knowledge in both than just choosing one or the other. They are different means to the same end. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dumfatnhappy Posted October 8, 2009 Share Posted October 8, 2009 what you consider "Mechanical" ie nuts and bolts, HVAC.... or pumps, tanks and pipes (process) for the latter I say MEP hands down (jury is still out on plant 3D) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Safwah Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 Everything in Safwah's post above (with image) I've done using plain AutoCAD. Not to say that is the way you should go but I think Inventor would not be your best choice in software. Oh so could I, but can you imagine what it would be like if you wanted to change the size of something? Or in autocad 3D's case, the one large solid you have been working on for the past 8 hours? Unless they changed that way solids are modeled in autocad since 09+ this would be a real headache. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReMark Posted October 12, 2009 Share Posted October 12, 2009 Yes Safwah you're right. A size change or a major change to a complex solid could give one a massive headache and lead to a lot of loss time. There are drawbacks to using plain AutoCAD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.