Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi, I found your site CopyBlockFromDrawing.lsp lisp.

Request is as follows:

Whether that could be a rewrite of Lisp so that worked in Bricscad.

Posted
i[t] seams that Bricscad still doesn't support DBX functionality

 

That's a shame - well, in that case, forget about the program I linked you to. :(

Guest kruuger
Posted

Lee

One question. What they mean by that:

"the ObjectDBX COM interface is currently not available. But it should be possible to create a drawing database and load a dwg file into it, and then to access information from that database."

How to "translate" this to lisp?

kruuger

Posted
"the ObjectDBX COM interface is currently not available. But it should be possible to create a drawing database and load a dwg file into it, and then to access information from that database."

 

I'm not entirely sure, but it sounds like that is what my code is currently doing: I create an ObjectDBX Document object and open a drawing file using it, then access the information from that drawing. Bit puzzled.

Guest kruuger
Posted
I'm not entirely sure, but it sounds like that is what my code is currently doing: I create an ObjectDBX Document object and open a drawing file using it, then access the information from that drawing. Bit puzzled.

hmm, it is weird, anyway

Thanks Lee

kruuger

Posted

Thanks for the discussion guys. My question may be ill-formed, should read

like this:

Is it possible to do this without using ObjectDBX (or command-GetInterfaceObject vla).

Because of this probably can not cope Bricscad

Posted
Thanks for the discussion guys. My question may be ill-formed, should read

like this:

Is it possible to do this without using ObjectDBX (or command-GetInterfaceObject vla).

Because of this probably can not cope Bricscad

 

Not in LISP I shouldn't think :unsure:

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...