Jump to content

2017 effectivename


Commandobill

Recommended Posts

I wrote a program a while back which included getting the effective name of a block for a friend. Since then his company upgraded to 2017, and on dynamic blocks only it gets the name instead (ie "*U108"). I don't have 2017 at work, can anyone confirm this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe that is correct. If I recall correctly there was a recent thread about the subject of dynamic / anonymous blocks and lisp routines. Why yes there was and here is a link to it (for what it's worth)...

 

http://www.cadtutor.net/forum/showthread.php?96415-Why-I-can-t-select-the-Anonymous-block-when-I-use-this-code.&highlight=anonymous

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...