t1320t Posted February 2, 2010 Posted February 2, 2010 Hello all- I'm using ACAD 2009 & am having problems when plotting to .pdf using "DWG to PDF.pc3". Here's the procedure I'm using.. 1. Plot the .dwg to .pdf using "DWG to PDF.pc3" 2. Open that .pdf from explorer 3. Plot that .pdf to our HP DJ 800 Ok, here's the problem.. the text plots fuzzy & hardly legible. The linework is fine, only the text is messed up. When I plot the exact same .dwg from ACAD using the exact same .ctb file everything comes out as desired. Why does the text look like crap when I plot it to a .pdf?? I have client waiting on these files & would really like to get this figure out. Thanks Quote
t1320t Posted February 3, 2010 Author Posted February 3, 2010 Not on subscription. Would that impact plotting?? Quote
ReMark Posted February 3, 2010 Posted February 3, 2010 No. Users of 2009 who are on Subscription qualified for a bonus feature that enhanced the capabilities of working with PDFs. OK. Line work is fine but text is "crappy". What font is being used? Have you tried a different printer? Have you tried a different font? Have you printed PDFs before with this same font and gotten better results? Quote
t1320t Posted February 3, 2010 Author Posted February 3, 2010 As usual ReMark is on it! Thanks! Yes, line work is fine. I think it boils down to fonts.... the fonts that are giving me problems are ISOCPEUR & Consolas. I played around w changing those fonts to romans.shx & the outcome was better. So, it looks like the transition to .pdf accepts the line work fine but has problems w various fonts... why?? In my mind, it seems like it simply snapping an image when converting to .pdf so it should simply accept the fonts as they are without adjusting them. I ended up dl'ing pdf facotry pro to get this job done.. it worked fine w the correct results. Quote
ReMark Posted February 3, 2010 Posted February 3, 2010 This is just a workaround. If I were "on it" I would have had a true "fix". Well for now it serves the purpose, right? Quote
t1320t Posted February 3, 2010 Author Posted February 3, 2010 Yep, it's only a workaround.. and for now it serves the purpose well enough to get this job out the door. The majority of companies that we deal w request dwgs, but on occasion we deal w architects who don't have "real" CAD who request .pdfs Quote
ReMark Posted February 3, 2010 Posted February 3, 2010 Anything unusual about the two fonts you are using? Quote
t1320t Posted February 3, 2010 Author Posted February 3, 2010 Not that I'm aware of. Define "unusual". Quote
ReMark Posted February 3, 2010 Posted February 3, 2010 Are they fancy or more complex compared to a Simplex or a Roman font for instance? I'm pretty sure the first one is an AutoCAD font. But Consolas...is that a TrueType font? Quote
t1320t Posted February 3, 2010 Author Posted February 3, 2010 Yeah, I guess they could be considered in comparison to Simplex or the Roman fonts. Sorry, I'm not sure how to determine whether Consolas is a TrueType font or not. Quote
ReMark Posted February 3, 2010 Posted February 3, 2010 TrueType fonts will have a file type extension of ttf as opposed to shx. Quote
t1320t Posted February 3, 2010 Author Posted February 3, 2010 I learn something new everyday... Neither of them have file type extensions Quote
ReMark Posted February 3, 2010 Posted February 3, 2010 That's because you haven't reset your Windows/files options to display known file types. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.