Jump to content

Inquiry: Station Labeling


runner214

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • fixo

    17

  • runner214

    9

  • stevesfr

    8

  • mgraubart

    4

That works perfect! Thanks for getting back to me so quickly.

 

Much Appreciated,

Matt

 

You're welcome

Glad to help

 

~'J'~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fixo:

 

  • Have worked out the wording position earlier suggested.

  • I insert my block "station" to over ride the lisp created one.

Last item - final total amount - reference attached dwg

 

also my lisp - referenced as "hal"

 

Any Ideas?

 

As usual appreciate your help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try attached lisp

 

~'J'~

 

Try entering 25 between stations, and the program goes bonkers and gets krazy !! also can you fix 1+0 to read 1+00 ?

thanks for attention to my pieve.

S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fixo:

 

  • Have worked out the wording position earlier suggested.

  • I insert my block "station" to over ride the lisp created one.

Last item - final total amount - reference attached dwg

 

also my lisp - referenced as "hal"

 

Any Ideas?

 

As usual appreciate your help.

 

I will look at your hal.lsp later

Right now I just changed one line of code

Try again

 

~'j'~

Stationing_50.LSP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

fixo:

 

Thanks for the reply.

 

The final station correction you supplied ( as per your last send ) totals the ending station but drops the "+" > ie: 388.81 3+88.81

 

also I changed this line:

 

(setvar "dimzin" 2) from to (setvar "dimzin" 4)

 

this is what steve asked earlier, (1+00 (but only strips the ".00")) on every other tic station. please see attached dwg example to better explain.

 

any suggestions?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try entering 25 between stations, and the program goes bonkers and gets krazy !! also can you fix 1+0 to read 1+00 ?

thanks for attention to my pieve.

S

 

Steve,

Better yet upload drawing here

and write in there some explanations

 

~'J'~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Steve,

Better yet upload drawing here

and write in there some explanations

 

~'J'~

 

Attached is result of loading ST100 and requesting 25.00 ft stations.

0+0 should be 0+00

0+25 is OK

1+0 should be 0+50

1+25 should be 0+75

2+0 should be 1+00

2+25 should be 1+25

etc.

?? did I make error in entry or ?

S

st100.dwg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Attached is result of loading ST100 and requesting 25.00 ft stations.

0+0 should be 0+00

0+25 is OK

1+0 should be 0+50

1+25 should be 0+75

2+0 should be 1+00

2+25 should be 1+25

etc.

?? did I make error in entry or ?

S

 

Ah, this make a sense

I know nothing about stationing :)

Ok, I'll rewrite it

 

~'J'~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Attached is result of loading ST100 and requesting 25.00 ft stations.

0+0 should be 0+00

0+25 is OK

1+0 should be 0+50

1+25 should be 0+75

2+0 should be 1+00

2+25 should be 1+25

etc.

?? did I make error in entry or ?

S

 

Try another one

Let me know if some bugs in there

 

~'J'~

Stationing_for_Steve.LSP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well done Mr. fixo!

 

This version works in all cases mentioned within my original post.

 

Thank you!

 

Oh, my God

I'm so happy (I'm tired a bit)

Cheers :)

 

~'J'~

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Try another one

Let me know if some bugs in there

 

~'J'~

 

If and when you have the time to perfect it for us surveyors.

One more small item to make it conform to most standard conventions. Rotate the block 180 degrees so it reads correctly from lower to higher stationing (as one would walk along the path)

 

presently one has to turn their head 180 degrees to read the stationing.

 

otherwise, great. thanks for the update

S

st-test.dwg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If and when you have the time to perfect it for us surveyors.

One more small item to make it conform to most standard conventions. Rotate the block 180 degrees so it reads correctly from lower to higher stationing (as one would walk along the path)

 

presently one has to turn their head 180 degrees to read the stationing.

 

otherwise, great. thanks for the update

S

 

Hi Steve,

Try this routine on new drawing, I think that the block

need to be recreated as it is in my code

 

~'J'~

Stationing_for_Steve_180_degs.LSP

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Steve,

Try this routine on new drawing, I think that the block

need to be recreated as it is in my code

 

~'J'~

 

 

Absolutely, positively, PERFECT !!

sincere thanks

S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...