mgraubart Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 For me it will always start from 100+00. User input may help others though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fixo Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 For me it will always start from 100+00. User input may help others though. Try attached lisp ~'J'~ Stationing_100.LSP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mgraubart Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 That works perfect! Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. Much Appreciated, Matt Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fixo Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 That works perfect! Thanks for getting back to me so quickly. Much Appreciated, Matt You're welcome Glad to help ~'J'~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
runner214 Posted June 9, 2010 Author Share Posted June 9, 2010 Fixo: Have worked out the wording position earlier suggested. I insert my block "station" to over ride the lisp created one. Last item - final total amount - reference attached dwg also my lisp - referenced as "hal" Any Ideas? As usual appreciate your help. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevesfr Posted June 9, 2010 Share Posted June 9, 2010 Try attached lisp ~'J'~ Try entering 25 between stations, and the program goes bonkers and gets krazy !! also can you fix 1+0 to read 1+00 ? thanks for attention to my pieve. S Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fixo Posted June 10, 2010 Share Posted June 10, 2010 Fixo: Have worked out the wording position earlier suggested. I insert my block "station" to over ride the lisp created one. Last item - final total amount - reference attached dwg also my lisp - referenced as "hal" Any Ideas? As usual appreciate your help. I will look at your hal.lsp later Right now I just changed one line of code Try again ~'j'~ Stationing_50.LSP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
runner214 Posted June 10, 2010 Author Share Posted June 10, 2010 fixo: Thanks for the reply. The final station correction you supplied ( as per your last send ) totals the ending station but drops the "+" > ie: 388.81 3+88.81 also I changed this line: (setvar "dimzin" 2) from to (setvar "dimzin" 4) this is what steve asked earlier, (1+00 (but only strips the ".00")) on every other tic station. please see attached dwg example to better explain. any suggestions? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fixo Posted June 10, 2010 Share Posted June 10, 2010 Try entering 25 between stations, and the program goes bonkers and gets krazy !! also can you fix 1+0 to read 1+00 ?thanks for attention to my pieve. S Steve, Better yet upload drawing here and write in there some explanations ~'J'~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevesfr Posted June 10, 2010 Share Posted June 10, 2010 Steve,Better yet upload drawing here and write in there some explanations ~'J'~ Attached is result of loading ST100 and requesting 25.00 ft stations. 0+0 should be 0+00 0+25 is OK 1+0 should be 0+50 1+25 should be 0+75 2+0 should be 1+00 2+25 should be 1+25 etc. ?? did I make error in entry or ? S st100.dwg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fixo Posted June 10, 2010 Share Posted June 10, 2010 Attached is result of loading ST100 and requesting 25.00 ft stations.0+0 should be 0+00 0+25 is OK 1+0 should be 0+50 1+25 should be 0+75 2+0 should be 1+00 2+25 should be 1+25 etc. ?? did I make error in entry or ? S Ah, this make a sense I know nothing about stationing Ok, I'll rewrite it ~'J'~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fixo Posted June 10, 2010 Share Posted June 10, 2010 Attached is result of loading ST100 and requesting 25.00 ft stations.0+0 should be 0+00 0+25 is OK 1+0 should be 0+50 1+25 should be 0+75 2+0 should be 1+00 2+25 should be 1+25 etc. ?? did I make error in entry or ? S Try another one Let me know if some bugs in there ~'J'~ Stationing_for_Steve.LSP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
runner214 Posted June 10, 2010 Author Share Posted June 10, 2010 Well done Mr. fixo! This version works in all cases mentioned within my original post. Thank you! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fixo Posted June 10, 2010 Share Posted June 10, 2010 Well done Mr. fixo! This version works in all cases mentioned within my original post. Thank you! Oh, my God I'm so happy (I'm tired a bit) Cheers ~'J'~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevesfr Posted June 10, 2010 Share Posted June 10, 2010 Try another oneLet me know if some bugs in there ~'J'~ If and when you have the time to perfect it for us surveyors. One more small item to make it conform to most standard conventions. Rotate the block 180 degrees so it reads correctly from lower to higher stationing (as one would walk along the path) presently one has to turn their head 180 degrees to read the stationing. otherwise, great. thanks for the update S st-test.dwg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fixo Posted June 11, 2010 Share Posted June 11, 2010 If and when you have the time to perfect it for us surveyors.One more small item to make it conform to most standard conventions. Rotate the block 180 degrees so it reads correctly from lower to higher stationing (as one would walk along the path) presently one has to turn their head 180 degrees to read the stationing. otherwise, great. thanks for the update S Hi Steve, Try this routine on new drawing, I think that the block need to be recreated as it is in my code ~'J'~ Stationing_for_Steve_180_degs.LSP Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stevesfr Posted June 11, 2010 Share Posted June 11, 2010 Hi Steve,Try this routine on new drawing, I think that the block need to be recreated as it is in my code ~'J'~ Absolutely, positively, PERFECT !! sincere thanks S Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fixo Posted June 11, 2010 Share Posted June 11, 2010 Absolutely, positively, PERFECT !!sincere thanks S Glad if that helps for you Sincerely, Oleg ~'J'~ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.