Lee Mac Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 I did. Same method as I described? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanjt Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 Same method as I described? Wow, that's sad. I purposely didn't look at your code so I wouldn't be influenced and I still did the same thing. Seemed like the easiest way to get the individual intersections. The only difference was I used a lambda expression instead of defining a separate subroutine. I feel rather uncreative. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Mac Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 Wow, that's sad. I purposely didn't look at your code so I wouldn't be influenced and I still did the same thing. Seemed like the easiest way to get the individual intersections. The only difference was I used a lambda expression instead of defining a separate subroutine. I feel rather uncreative. Yeah, I was just curious - it does seem like the easiest way to approach the problem, I suppose you could avoid the break by creating the lines manually (feasible I suppose as we are dealing only with lines), but tbh break just seems easier... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanjt Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 Yeah, I was just curious - it does seem like the easiest way to approach the problem, I suppose you could avoid the break by creating the lines manually (feasible I suppose as we are dealing only with lines), but tbh break just seems easier...Yeah, I thought about that, but then you'd have to delete the old lines and get all the necessary data from them. It just wasn't worth it. I suppose you could copy each line, then entmod accordingly, but as you said, Break was the easiest route.Did you remember to trans your points to match UCS? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Mac Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 Did you remember to trans your points to match UCS? You've got a thing about that lol... yep 0 -> 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanjt Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 You've got a thing about that lol... yep 0 -> 1 LoL I deal with a lot of rotated UCS, so I have to always remember to trans my (getpoint). It's funky with command usage, because you have to remember to trans your WCS to UCS. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lpseifert Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 C'mon Doc... it could be an emergency. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanjt Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 C'mon Doc... it could be an emergency. This can easily be accomplished with TRIM. eg. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lee Mac Posted June 23, 2010 Share Posted June 23, 2010 Nice idea! - that is probably a lot more robust than using a LISP... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanjt Posted June 24, 2010 Share Posted June 24, 2010 Nice idea! - that is probably a lot more robust than using a LISP... Funny how doing so much LISP programming rots one's brain. I can't believe I didn't suggest this earlier. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.