Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

It isn't the same thing. If I sign a piece of paper and gave you a copy, you'd have a copy of my signature and I'd have the original. You can't make an original of my signature but I can. A digital signature is the same thing. How is that so hard to understand? Using your logic, we already have his seal scanned to a PDF with his signature. We can just copy it and paste it all we want because we have it.

 

With a digital signature, you can't copy and paste it. It's encrypted with a code that is specific to only one person and cannot be copied. Get it yet?

  • Replies 24
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • Tuns

    12

  • tzframpton

    11

  • Organic

    1

  • neophoible

    1

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

http://www.tbpe.state.tx.us/enforce_faqs.htm

 

An electronic signature is a digital representation of an engineer's signature.
I'm not talking about some super encrypted code. I'm talking directly about a digital representation of a seal, date and signature. This is what the state of Texas requires.
Posted

And you're saying that the state of Texas doesn't allow a digitally encrypted signature on the seal to protect yourself? That doesn't seem right.

 

The engineer must maintain the security of the electronic signature consistent with maintaining the protection of their seal.
Posted

I'm not disputing that part. We're arguing two completely different points here. My point is this (as well as Organic's): Issue for Construction Documents are required to be signed and sealed by a registered and/or licensed professional engineer on the plans for it to be validated as a workable set of documents. It makes no difference if it's physical wet sealed and signed with an ink pen by the engineer himself, or if the engineer uses a representation of his seal/sig in a digital form. Either way, this is what Texas requires, AND both methods can be duplicated illegally with ease.

 

The engineer doesn't want to give anybody direct access to a digital form of his signature, just the same he wouldn't hand out duplicate and usable copies of his wet seal and a signature so a typography artist could reference his handwriting. Which is why I brought my point of would you let someone physical have a usable copy of your SS card and passport.

 

Two totally different things here. Why am I still commenting on this thread? The engineer can approve or decline any use of his property anyways regardless of opinion, lol.

 

Anyways, glad we got it clarified. Driving me bonkers up here in Dallas, I tell ya!! haha

Posted

You bring up nonsensical points sometimes man. Anyways, I'm going to get back to work while you go buy another bucket of red herrings. Thanks for your comments. :)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...