MrTapir Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 Ive been given a new computer and told to test it and see if its spec is suitable for us and it has AutoCAD 2014 on it. Basically I wondered what are some really resource hungry things I can do on it to test how much the computer spec can cope with? I should say that I dont really use the 3D parts of autoCAD but i imagine that would be more intensive, which is why i put it here. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReMark Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 What are the specs on this new computer? Have you checked the specs against what AutoDesk has on its website for recommended minimum system requirements? Cadalyst magazine used to make available a benchmarking program for AutoCAD systems but I'm not sure if it is offered any more. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrTapir Posted July 28, 2014 Author Share Posted July 28, 2014 Its lenovo p300 i5-4570 with 8GB ram, i know the specs will be ok, its more because there is another computer that is a bit higher spec but a bit more expensive which we were originally going to get and then right at the last minute this lenovo has been suggested so I wanted really to test things and see how they actually run and where it might struggle or not. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackBox Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 FWIW - AutoCAD products, despite being 64-Bit and the advent of Core Console, are still just single-threaded... Until that changes, any moderate to high performance workstation is generally acceptable, depending on the exact nature of one's work (you do Transport?). Never buy the minimum system requirements; double or triple them at minimum. I am fortunate to work with a beast of a workstation by some standards, I do work in Civil 3D though, and can say that my workstation isn't even enough from time to time (see computer details at left). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titi95 Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 for 3D autocad 8gb memory is too little, we must mini 16 Processor with 4 cores this is mainly just for rendering. You like what graphics card? Look at my muscular configue I have in my profile to give you an idea and tell you that I can saturate on large 3D projects (but overall I'm very happy of course) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikekmx Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 graphics card is king Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titi95 Posted July 28, 2014 Share Posted July 28, 2014 this is what I recommend for 3D autocad http://www.videocardbenchmark.net/high_end_gpus.html pros cards are not the best for autocad (I tested before a quadro 5000) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dadgad Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 (edited) Its lenovo p300 i5-4570 with 8GB ram, i know the specs will be ok, its more because there is another computer that is a bit higher spec but a bit more expensive which we were originally going to get and then right at the last minute this lenovo has been suggested so I wanted really to test things and see how they actually run and where it might struggle or not. I bought a Lenove with 16GB ram, for about $1000, unfortunately when I bought it I failed to notice that there was no CAPITALS indicator light, which drives me nuts. The computer is fine, alothough the resolution on that monitor is not good, expecially compared to my Dell which is outstanding. Titi thanks for posting that benchmark link, lots of good information there. Edited July 29, 2014 by Dadgad Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BIGAL Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 (edited) A simple Civ3d test we have multiple aerial images pasted along a road with corresponding layouts for each section how fast when jumping between layouts should be say max 1 sec. old pc was wait wait wait wait ok now. I have 86 civ3d style layouts how quick to jump layouts like above any delay start to question. Mine simple 64bit I5 8Mb ram. (note intel graphics corporate box) get more ram go 16Gb its so cheap hit a big surface model and grunt required you want to stop paging to disk. Years ago there was test autocad program did stuff like copy + paste a 100, move erase undo pretty simple but you ended up with a number. Did some basic render also. Found it at Cadalyst only problem and perhaps Cadtutor modertator can help is that they ask that results not be published without their permission. Perhaps ok if on Cadtutor only Edited July 29, 2014 by BIGAL Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReMark Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 for 3D autocad 8gb memory is too little, we must mini 16 The OP doesn't do 3D so 16GB of RAM would be a waste of money. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dadgad Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 The OP doesn't do 3D so 16GB of RAM would be a waste of money. Having been tasked with testing it on behalf of his company, rather than expressly for his own personal use, that may or may not be the case. It is certainly preferable to have more RAM than needed, than too little, if the modest additional cost is not a deal breaker. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titi95 Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 What is OP ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ReMark Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 OP = Original poster. That refers to the person who started the thread. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SLW210 Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 Having been tasked with testing it on behalf of his company, rather than expressly for his own personal use,that may or may not be the case. It is certainly preferable to have more RAM than needed, than too little, if the modest additional cost is not a deal breaker. Except, in this instance the OP is tasked with finding the weak points of the machine at hand, not specifying the needs for a new machine. Here is the Cadalyst test...http://www.cadalyst.com/benchmark-test For simple 2D, My 32-bit 4GB machine handles most everything I can throw at it, I have to get into to some really huge files to get it to hang up or crash, generally Aerial Images. I like BIGAL's test for that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrTapir Posted July 29, 2014 Author Share Posted July 29, 2014 (edited) BigAl, thanks I'll try that. Your computer sounds similar spec to the lenovo. Unfortunately it will be 8GB ram and no more - work IT policy. we had to fight hard enough to get 64bit. The graphics card in the lenovo looks like a K600 which doesnt score very highly in that benchmarking. Although saying that my current one is a Quadro FX1800 which is even lower. SLW210 thanks for that link/test, very useful. Edited July 29, 2014 by MrTapir Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titi95 Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 For info http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-workstation-graphics-card,3493-3.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackBox Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 For infohttp://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/best-workstation-graphics-card,3493-3.html Woot - My workstation's video card is top of the stack! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Titi95 Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 Yes For 2D... (and bit) Sunflower pages for other results Pro cards are worse on Autocad 3D Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackBox Posted July 29, 2014 Share Posted July 29, 2014 Yes For 2D... (and bit) Sunflower pages for other results Pro cards are worse on Autocad 3D I saw them - I work in Civil 3D, which isn't a real 3D environment such as Maya, Max etc. as one might infer from the application's title. Very little of my work is done in 'real 3D' (Object Viewer on occasion, no rendering for output, etc.), which is why my video card is bangarang, like Skrillex. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrTapir Posted July 30, 2014 Author Share Posted July 30, 2014 THat test is good, I've run it and got some results to compare to my current machine (favourable). I wondered if i post it here can anyone make a comment on the results Ive got? This is the Lenovo. c2015_LENOVO RESULTS.dwg Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.