Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I’m trying to ensure that a bunch of routines are fully localized version proof – so far I’m aware of below translated features:

 

- names of built-in commands

(command "_LINE"

 

- options of built-in commands

(command "_ARC" "_C"

 

- selection methods for SSGET statements

(ssget "_X")

 

- built-in linetypes (excepting CONTINUOUS)

 

There are some other "translations" that should be taken into consideration? Thank you.

Posted

For built in commands, I would advise using "_." eg,

 

(command "_.ARC" "_C"

 

To make sure that the default command definition is used, in case the ARC command has been redefined.

 

Lee

Posted

Good point! Thanks again, Lee!

 

So, there aren’t other features to take into consideration for a fully proof tool regarding localized features?

Posted
Good point! Thanks again, Lee!

 

So, there aren’t other features to take into consideration for a fully proof tool regarding localized features?

 

You're welcome :) The only other one that comes to mind at the minute is through initget in getkword calls.

Posted

You are right, but this should be taken into consideration only when translate also the interface of the routine. If is about an English interfaced tool that have to be used on a non-English AutoCAD environment the INITGET statements go un-affected.

I was concerned about features that may cause AutoLISP routine / AutoCAD to crash.

Posted
You are right, but this should be taken into consideration only when translate also the interface of the routine. If is about an English interfaced tool that have to be used on a non-English AutoCAD environment the INITGET statements go un-affected.

I was concerned about features that may cause AutoLISP routine / AutoCAD to crash.

 

Ok, just making sure you were aware :)

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...