Please check my drawing

[kuwait]

helloooooooooooooooo:)

from the first time i did this completely by myself

please check it

did i miss something???

enriqe.dwg

[ReMark]

Well I like that you use different layers and colors for different features.

 

You have a layer called ph - phantom line type - color: blue yet you use it as one would a centerline in your plan view. Why is that?

 

The dimension shown as 128 in the front view lists the linetype "center" when I check it's properties yet in the Layer Properties Manager you have assigned the continuous linetype. Why did you override it?

 

Now that I've checked all your dimensions I see that for some reason the linetype is listed as "center" and not as "continuous" per the layer settings. Don't do that.

 

Layer 0 is black. Your section line A-A text is blue yet it is on layer 0. Why? I would recommend creating a separate layer called Text.

 

Zooming in close on some of your geometry I noticed some irregularities. Ex. - dimension extension lines that don't quite match up with the object (looks like they shifted a bit). A couple of other oddities too. Might want to go back and check. Do you use Osnaps on a regular basis?

[Cad64]

And again I have renamed your thread to something more descriptive.

Please name your threads appropriately.

[Eatonpcat]

I've seen worse, but it looks like you need to get familiar with osnaps.

[dbroada]

Your section AA is incorrect. you have correctly shown the middle hole but you have not shown the other two vertical holes or the 5mm hole.

 

you have dimensioned the boss twice but not the hole.

 

the hidden lines in the end view do not pick up the large vetical holes

[stevsmith]

In addition to Dave's comments I would also comment on the centreline projection of the centre hole that do not tie up with your projected view.

[ReMark]

Seems like someone needs to go back to the drawing board.

[kencaz]

Your section AA is incorrect. you have correctly shown the middle hole but you have not shown the other two vertical holes or the 5mm hole.

 

you have dimensioned the boss twice but not the hole.

 

the hidden lines in the end view do not pick up the large vetical holes

 

Another good reason to model in 3D. You don't have to worry about how your section is suppose to look, it's created for you.

 

KC

[Wilbri]

Thank's all for your contribution

 

Considering myself to be a reasonable 2D operator, I have found the replies to this topic most interesting.

I am presently becoming acquainted with 3D and even with my limited experience thus far, am convinced that this is definitely the way to go.

[JD Mather]

I ran out of time and I am missing a couple of center lines - maybe something else as well, but this should give you some ideas.

Kuwait.dwf

[MikeScott]

Nice.. I like the way the part is curved in the section JD did.. Within the cutout of the 5mm hole on the exterior profile. That line would indeed curve away like that.. it's a nice touch.

 

The 5mm holes gave me pause until I realized JD drew them wider than the supposedly 5mm internal slot, so JD's section is showing where that hole cuts the sides of the track. It shouldn't do that if the hole is the same width as the track.

 

I was unable to see Wilbri's.. since I'm using an older version of CAD.

[JD Mather]

...It shouldn't do that if the hole is the same width as the track.

 

I was in a hurry and didn't catch that - I drew for a square key rather than a rectangular key.

[MikeScott]

Don't sweat it, it's still a good job, I was just pointing it out incase someone wondered what happened there.

[Wilbri]

Mike.

 

"I was unable to see Wilbri's.. since I'm using an older version of CAD."

 

I merely added some comments. No drawing was attached.

[MikeScott]

Mike.

 

"I was unable to see Wilbri's.. since I'm using an older version of CAD."

 

I merely added some comments. No drawing was attached.

 

Sorry I meant Kuwait's original post.. for some reason your name stuck in my head instead.

[JD Mather]

... unable to see '... since I'm using an older version of CAD."

 

Here is a redline of the original.

 

If the OP posts a revised drawing I will revise my solution as well.

enriqe.dwf

[JD Mather]

If the OP posts a revised drawing I will revise my solution as well.

 

Well kuwait,

If you really want help this will require response by you. Where is your revised drawing based on the help given so far? Are you communicating with your professor? This is a back-and-forth process to discover what you have learned and where you are still having difficulty.

[ReMark]

I guess it was a rhetorical request. Did the OP disappear or just lose interest?

[MikeScott]

Here is a redline of the original.

 

If the OP posts a revised drawing I will revise my solution as well.

 

Thanks, JD. I downloaded True view, and it permitted me to open his original, but I can't open your DWF with CAD or TrueView (TV only accepts DWG or DXF).

 

All I can say is that they really need to look at using Object Snaps for just about EVERYTHING they draw... there's a lot of things in that drawing that wouldn't be out of alignment if they'd done that.

 

Also, they need a better understanding of how a section works.. Draw a guideline down from anything that intersects the section line, or would be visible beyond it... those are your guides to where things

 

It seemed as though the bottom view was a cross between a section and a sideview, but some portions didn't align with either type of view.

 

For example, where that middle table portion runs into the two main keyways. From a SECTION VIEW, in the position they had the section marker, that table should have visually stopped as soon as the cylinders started (rather than the overlap that was drawn).

 

In a SIDE VIEW, the table would appear to continue all the way to the centerlines of the cylinders. That's because in the top view, you can see that that's how far it goes before there's a change in direction.

[JD Mather]

Did the OP disappear or just lose interest?

 

Just guessing here:

 

The assignment due date has passed.

 

Section views are usually covered in class well down the road from simple othographic projection - at this point in the class anyone still in the class should know how to use object snaps, trim properly and simple orthographic projection.

 

My guess is the assignment was do soon after the OP posted and once the due date passed the OP was no longer interested in the problem.

 

This short attention span and blinders-on view of only looking for the solution to an assignment as opposed to learning the general principles of orthographic projection and then section view representation is a sure shortcut to failure.