Enigma Posted November 17, 2010 Share Posted November 17, 2010 My company is looking to implement a document management system, and so far we are leaning heavily towards the Adept Synergis software. Upper management would like to see some comparisons and reviews from users and other software companies. If I may be so bold, I have a list of questions for anyone using (or has used) any document control programs before, the questions leaning more towards responses from Synergis users though. 1. What document management software did you consider and what was your prevailing factor for selecting Synergis? 2. What processes were you using to manage your documentation prior switching Synergis? 3. What problems were you experiencing that made this software necessary? 4. Did you make any additional changes to your management processes after switching to Synergis? 5. Which departments in your organization are using the tool? How is the adoption in the organization? Particularly with remote offices. 6. How long have you been using Synergis for? 7. How would you rate document management efficiency improvement after introducing Synergis (scale 1-5); 8. When did you start your implementation and how long did it take you to implement until using Synergis at the full extent? 9. Would you please briefly describe your user base and the level of PLM user experience you consider your people to be at; (scale 1-5) 10. What is your CAD system? 11. How many users and how many floating licences? 12. How satisfied are you with Synergis BOM and ECN features (scale 1-5)? 13. How satisfied were you with the Synergis tech support during and after installation (scale 1-5)? 14. How would you rate the application User Training for each module (scale 1-5)? 15. Did you do any software customization? 16. How satisfied are you with remote support response time (scale 1-5)? What would you do differently if you had the opportunity to do it again? 18. What problems, if any, arose during implementation and how were these problems resolved? 19. What problems, if any, have arisen subsequent to implementation? 20. Would you recommend Synergis to other companies? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hendie Posted January 13, 2011 Share Posted January 13, 2011 1. What document management software did you consider and what was your prevailing factor for selecting Synergis? We initially identified 12 companies, shortlisted those to 6, then brought each of the 6 companies in to give us a demonstration and have a question and answer session. From the outset, Synergis provided honest and factual information which they could back up by demonstration or by facts. They didn't try to fluff us and evade any answers like some of the companies did. 2. What processes were you using to manage your documentation prior switching Synergis? We were using Cyco Automanager Workflow, (now Teamwork). We also looked at Meridian EDMS but were extremely unhappy with the service from that company and it's partners. 3. What problems were you experiencing that made this software necessary? We wanted a truly global EDMS solution. We also wanted a software that didn't encrypt your information 4. Did you make any additional changes to your management processes after switching to Synergis? Yes, Adept made our processes a lot easier 5. Which departments in your organization are using the tool? How is the adoption in the organization? Particularly with remote offices. Engineering, Manufacturing, Design, Sales, - it's pretty much deployed throughout the company. Initially, one business started using Adept, Now we have 6 different businesses using Adept with 2 more businessses looking at implementing Adept. We haev found that once someone becomes aware of Adept, and takes a look at it, they generally want in on the game. Remote offices have been no problem. We have Adept deployed in the USA, throughout Europe, South Africa and the Far East 6. How long have you been using Synergis for? around 5 or 6 years now 7. How would you rate document management efficiency improvement after introducing Synergis (scale 1-5); definitely 5 8. When did you start your implementation and how long did it take you to implement until using Synergis at the full extent? not sure I understand the question. Our switchover from our old EDMS to Adept took around 3 days, we experienced no downtime and everyone was up, running and trained with a few days. 9. Would you please briefly describe your user base and the level of PLM user experience you consider your people to be at; (scale 1-5) Engineering, Design, Manufacturing R & D, Sales - anyone who needs access to the data. The experience level changes with role and how much they need to interact with the system. 10. What is your CAD system? AutoCad vanilla, AutoCAD Inventor, Solidworks 11. How many users and how many floating licences? around 200 users 12. How satisfied are you with Synergis BOM and ECN features (scale 1-5)? currently don't use them 13. How satisfied were you with the Synergis tech support during and after installation (scale 1-5)? 5+ 14. How would you rate the application User Training for each module (scale 1-5)? I have developed our own training. Generally we found that users can be up and running in as little as a one hour training session 15. Did you do any software customization? Yes 16. How satisfied are you with remote support response time (scale 1-5)? 5+ 17. What would you do differently if you had the opportunity to do it again? we really haven't had any issues which made us think that we should have went a different path 18. What problems, if any, arose during implementation and how were these problems resolved? none at alll - very smooth transition. we actually finished about 3 days ahead of schedule 19. What problems, if any, have arisen subsequent to implementation? a few glitches here and there which have been promptly dealt with by Synergis. Most of the issues we have experienced have been to do with the viewer, written by Oracle 20. Would you recommend Synergis to other companies? yes, have done so and those companies have subsequently purchased Adept and are very happy with it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enigma Posted January 13, 2011 Author Share Posted January 13, 2011 Thank you hendie, much appreciated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enigma Posted August 31, 2011 Author Share Posted August 31, 2011 Well we are all set up now and will be slowly implementing the system across the company. Currently it's just our Engineering department using it but so far so good. It is a little hard to get used to the new workflow for creating drawings, but that will get easier with use. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Enigma Posted July 27, 2012 Author Share Posted July 27, 2012 Adept Synergis just released this case study article based on our experiences so far: http://gfxspeak.com/2012/07/09/improved-document-management-reduces-project-hours-45-percent-for-biomass-energy-expert-nexterra-systems/ I couldn't imagine not using it now. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Iceworm72 Posted September 23, 2014 Share Posted September 23, 2014 I am working through a list of vendors and capabilities. We will be maintaining a new plant shortly and are currently examining BlueCielo's Meridian, OpenText EDM and Synergis Adept as our top three EDM packages. I am wondering if you gentlemen and your companies are still happy with Adept. The information I have found online seems to be making them appear to be not only a price leader but the simplest to implement from scratch. I noted that customization was mentioned. What form were those customizations (Custom Code or System Configuration)? If it was custom code what language(s) does Adept require? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.