MiGo Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 I would like to capture al list of all the current frozen layers in a drawing so I can re-freeze all the layers that were frozen prior to running a command like laythw. so maybe a routine for capturing then another one that uses that list to re-freeze. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackBox Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Have you considered using Layer States? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanjt Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 What's wrong with LayerP after you are finished with whatever you had to do to force thawing all layers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rkmcswain Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 Agree with RenderMan. You can certainly do it with a lisp routine, but Layer States will do it with no code writing needed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlackBox Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 What's wrong with LayerP after you are finished with whatever you had to do to force thawing all layers? Absolutely nothing. I use it (LayerP) frequently when working in a single drawing for a multitude of tasks. However, I have standardized / automated out Layer States as well, which has been an invaluable feature in expediting our production workflows. This has led to fewer mistakes, less time spent on manually ensuring standards, and provided more time for designers / technicians alike to focus on their respective tasks instead. ^^ I'm admittedly a bit biased ^^ Agree with RenderMan. You can certainly do it with a lisp routine, but Layer States will do it with no code writing needed. Cheers! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alanjt Posted April 25, 2011 Share Posted April 25, 2011 I'm not saying one is better than the other, but it seemed to be he was wanting to thaw all layers, do some stuff and put them back to where they were. Unless he was editing layer data, LayerP would be quicker and more than sufficient. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MiGo Posted April 26, 2011 Author Share Posted April 26, 2011 The layer state is perfect. Didn't know about it. Thanks!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.