rkent Posted December 12, 2012 Posted December 12, 2012 The instructions say to provide front, top, and aux view. I think it would look like this. Quote
SLW210 Posted December 12, 2012 Posted December 12, 2012 I thought the instructions were draw necessary views? Quote
ReMark Posted December 12, 2012 Posted December 12, 2012 Don't give them what they asked for...give them what they need! LoL Quote
rkent Posted December 12, 2012 Posted December 12, 2012 I thought the instructions were draw necessary views? I was asked to draw this drawing with a front view, top view and a auxiliary view but I am not ... This is what the OP wrote and given that an auxiliary view is asked for it is my opinion that this would be what they are after. Quote
SLW210 Posted December 12, 2012 Posted December 12, 2012 I was looking at the image...[ATTACH=CONFIG]39200[/ATTACH] but I am not quite sure what I was asked to do.... Quote
rkent Posted December 12, 2012 Posted December 12, 2012 (edited) The exercise is for auxiliary views, straight out of the Giesecke Technical Drawing book, auxiliary views section. So the image is asking for necessary views in the context of a chapter about auxiliary views. So there is that along with the instructions the OP shared. Edited December 12, 2012 by rkent Quote
ReMark Posted December 12, 2012 Posted December 12, 2012 Well the OP could probably use the practice. I think he should draw every conceivable view plus a section or two. Practice makes perfect. Just a non-serious suggestion. No offense meant. Quote
JD Mather Posted December 12, 2012 Posted December 12, 2012 (edited) edit - looks like this solution was 1st angle projection - but missing counterbored holes. My preference would be two partial auxiliaries (the isometric and right side views in my image are not needed) Also - this is clearly a mistake in the book. I would move the bottom arrow up one line. (the Gieske book if full of errors like this - but it is useful in a way for students to identify errors rather than have everything perfect for them) This simple model is a very good example of why to use 3D to create 2D. This thing is real torture to draw with classical board-style orthographic projection. Edited December 13, 2012 by JD Mather Quote
rkent Posted December 12, 2012 Posted December 12, 2012 JD - yeah thanks, the views were done from VIEWBASE command so I either had the 1st angle projection option turned on or I moved the view. I didn't save the drawing so I can't check it. And I wasn't trying to do the whole thing for them, just enough to show the auxiliary view. Quote
Dadgad Posted December 13, 2012 Posted December 13, 2012 It took me a while to notice that you can set the projection type with the contextual right click menu on the drawing layout tab while in the VIEWBASE command. As I don't use the ribbon, I always had to go looking for it there, which bugged me. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.