Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The LIST command is useful when I need to inspect an entity’s properties, such as its coordinates, length, radius, or object type. It can help when a drawing looks correct but I need to verify the actual geometry.

However, one limitation is that LIST reports geometric data rather than explaining why an operation failed. For example, if a 3D Boolean operation fails, the LIST output alone may not reveal whether the problem is caused by intersecting geometry, invalid solids, or another modeling issue.

When troubleshooting a difficult 3D modeling problem, how far do you rely on LIST before switching to other inspection methods?

Posted (edited)

FYI, I used to run the LIST command quite a bit to give me information about the object(s) in question.  But with the introduction of the Properties command in AutoCAD 2000, I slowly got used to leaving the Properties window opened/docked in the drawing area. Then as an object is selected, it's "properties" would automatically be filled out for me to inspect inside the Properties window. There's no need to run an extra command sequence like the LIST command which then would have to display the information on on a separate Text screen. In addition, the Properties window makes it possible for you to enter new values into those property items that can be modified. 

Edited by Paul Li
Posted
16 minutes ago, Paul Li said:

FYI, I used to run the LIST command quite a bit to give me information about the object(s) in question.  But with the introduction of the Properties command in AutoCAD 2000, I slowly got used to leaving the Properties window opened/docked in the drawing area. Then as an object is selected, it's "properties" would automatically be filled out for me to inspect inside the Properties window. There's no need to run an extra command sequence like the LIST command which then would have to display the information on on a separate Text screen. In addition, the Properties window makes it possible for you to enter new values into those property items that can be modified. 

AutoCADtutorials

 

That makes sense! Keeping Properties open is definitely more convenient when checking and changing values repeatedly. I guess LIST is still useful when you want a quick text-based report of an entity, but Properties is more practical for everyday editing.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...